tsunamix1
Researcher
Full Member
Posts: 151
|
 |
« Reply #7 on: January 17, 2010, 01:25:34 PM » |
|
Sure wouldve loved to hear , how that one went over at the company watercooler! i bet the next one with a piece of paper , wont get shown any love!! I'm glad to see , someone get the proper response! , at least thats how its supposed to go. a response that's part of the norm , instead of the exception. Even better is , the officers , follow their regs and then they would nt have stopped him , in the first place , lacking probable cause to start with.
At present , i'm lookin into , filing cross-complaints everytime , i get a citation , this way a challenge of all the jurisdictional issues , have to get addressed and once the officers complaint falls through the crack , he is left , with paying damages. Its the only way , i see , that we stand a chance of getting these "street urchins" to do what the law requires of them and no more, after all we dont pay them to sweep the streets too, and their duties are outlined for them in black and white, and if they cant read or understand or they wont read and understand , then the unemployment office is where they belong. I for one want my money's worth, not that my money is worth anything, so says the boss of the I R S, the treasury, until tax time rolls around , then those stamps are "income". ( will someone please make up their minds), but i digress. All of the conclusions of law, proffered by officers , have to be rebutted and i believer there is no better way , to do that , and get their attention , is to cross file , with a nice number attached , maybe 150,000.
I know i'd give it a second thought before , i'd violate someones rights, if i knew it would financially wreak havoc in my life. At the moment , there are very few people espousing , the aggressive tactic, which is holding the promise of a quicker positive response, from those that normally, dont get anything in the way of a threat , from those whos rights they violate at will.
|
